Evaluation
The submission would be evaluated based on 5 parameters: theme-fitting, aesthetics, originality, practicality, and environmental awareness of the design. Awards would be based on the average grades given by all jurors.
Phase 01 | Judging, Marking & Decisions
- Jurors would have access to all entries and access the entries according to the 5 parameters. Each juror would nominate 3 potential winners to help with tie-breakers in top entries.
- The distribution of rankings and comments from the jury panel would be processed to generate the final results.
Phase 02 | Winners Announced & Publications
- Public Vote would be conducted on our Facebook Page or our Intranet studio • mOOO to avoid duplicate accounts and votes (use of automated bots is banned for this session)
- Winners, Finalists, People’s Choice & Honourable Mentions would be announced through various online platforms shortly after the Public Vote session
Awards & Publications for Top 36 Entries
3 x WINNERS
[ EVENT PRIZE + PUBLICATIONS ]
9 x FINALISTS
[ PUBLICATIONS ]
3 x PEOPLE’S CHOICE (FROM TOP 36)
[FREE COPY OF DESIGN PUBLICATIONS ]
24 x HONOURABLE MENTION
[ PUBLICATIONS ]
